If your attorney misconduct complaint was closed without the State Bar seeking discipline, you have the right to request a second look.
When the Office of Chief Trial Counsel (OCTC) closes a complaint against an attorney without seeking discipline, the complainant has the right to request that the State Bar’s Complaint Review Unit (CRU) review that decision. This process is commonly called a “second look.”
CRU is currently part of the Office of General Counsel (OGC). Being separate from OCTC helps ensure the independence of the review process. See State Bar Rules of Procedure, rule 2603(b).
You can only request a review after OCTC closes a complaint. If you have new evidence, questions, or other issues while a complaint is being processed by OCTC, please communicate with your most recent assigned contact in OCTC as listed on the letter you received advising you of your complaint’s assignment or as indicated in subsequent OCTC communications with you.
When OCTC closes a complaint without further action, the complainant receives a notice that explains the complaint review process. In general, you have 90 calendar days from the date of OCTC’s notice to seek a review by CRU. However, in certain special circumstances, the period in which you may seek review may be 30 calendar days. Please carefully review OCTC's notice for specific timing requirements in your matter.
You cannot request a review of complaints that result in attorney discipline or of complaints against nonattorneys.
If you have questions about the review process, or an issue relating to OCTC’s processing of a pending complaint that you have been unable to resolve through other channels, you may also contact the Public Trust Liaison.
The second look process is similar to an administrative appeal. Its purpose is to determine whether the decision to close a complaint without further action was appropriate. If you request a review, the CRU attorney reviews the complaint file and any other material you submit. The attorney then assesses the allegations made against the attorney. CRU does not perform any additional investigation of the complaint’s allegations.
If the CRU attorney determines that you provided significant new evidence or finds other good cause to reopen the complaint, the matter is returned to OCTC with a recommendation that it be reopened for further action.
If CRU determines that your complaint should remain closed, you will receive a notice explaining why. You will also be informed that you can seek further review with the California Supreme Court. You would do this by filing a verified Accusation against the attorney, pursuant to In re Walker (1948) 32 Cal.2d 488. This is informally known as a Walker petition.
Complainants have 60 calendar days from the date of CRU’s letter to file a Walker petition. See California Rules of Court, rule 9.13(d).
If you are notified by OCTC that your complaint against an attorney was closed without disciplinary action, you may request review by CRU. In general, you must request review within 90 calendar days from the date of OCTC’s closing letter. However, in certain special circumstances, the period in which you may seek review may be 30 calendar days. Please carefully review OCTC's notice for specific timing requirements in your matter.
Extensions to the 30- or 90-day period to seek review may be granted for good cause if requested before the end of the review period applicable to your matter. You may submit such requests to the email or address below.
Requests for review should be submitted in writing to CRU via email to CRU@calbar.ca.gov or by mail:
State Bar of California Complaint Review Unit 180 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105
State Bar of California Complaint Review Unit 845 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017
Your request should explain the reason you believe your complaint was improperly closed. Please also submit any new supporting materials that were not already submitted to OCTC. Please note: you do not need to resubmit to CRU materials that were already in your OCTC complaint file.